“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] So—I am personally sending you a surplus, and I am directing it in those areas in which you need it most. I am saturating you with it. [...]

The reason for the difficulty with the muscles is so obvious that I am surprised you did not make the connections yourself. [...]

[...] I am going to trip here or here or there, or someone is going to trip me up, or certainly someone will throw a stone in my path.” [...]

[...] We will give you some suggestions on this when I am finished.

[...] I am not speaking now necessarily to you, for I have said this before: remember areas of health and vitality. [...]

[...] People go from illness to illness and from poverty to poverty from lack of the knowledge I am giving you.

I am not making you overextend yourself this evening.

([Theodore M:] “In part, I don’t get you because I am still reflecting on something you have just previously said.”)

I am not saying anything new. [...]

[...] Now this is something she has taken upon herself and in her way, and I am not necessarily agreeing with this you understand, in her way she is trying to pay back errors that she feels that she made in the past. [...]

(To Joel) I am keeping an eye out for this one back here also and a hand in to see what is going on. [...]

Now I am simply giving you a brief idea of what is involved, and I expect each of you to follow through in your own way, to see the connections and think about them. [...]

[...] There is more in what I am saying than you presently realize. [...]

[...] And (with humorous emphasis) I am not giving you any more intellectual clues!

[...] Nor am I discussing living in an “ideal” environment all the time.

I am speaking about the intellect here for our discussion, but remember it is everywhere cushioned also. [...]

(Pause in an intent delivery.) I am doing my best to explain the very practical aspects of the intellect’s beliefs, and their strength in drawing experience to you. [...]

I am not an artist, but I know what I like as much as anyone else does.

I told you once (to Florence)—and I tell you all—in your quiet moments to say “Who am I?” And listen—listen then. [...]

And if the life force did not sustain you, then you could cry, “I am I!” to nothing, for there would be no self to cry. [...]

[...] (I am referring to “another” relationship, but the same applies to your present wife.)

[...] And it is not difficult—if you ask yourself—“Who am I?”—and listen for the answer. [...]

[...] Yet for our sessions I must synchronize many activities, so that on some occasions I am with you, and I am also involved elsewhere.

[...] In my case, however, I am aware of the same kind of activities, only in regard to many realities rather than one.²

[...] (Humorously:) I am not comparing you with motes of dust by any means; to some extent, however, you do share in my journeys. [...]

[...] You most probably take this to mean that I am implying the possibility of an unending state of youth. While youth can be physically “prolonged” far beyond its present duration, that is not what I am saying.

[...] All of this applies in degrees according to the species, and when I speak of conscious memory I am using words that are familiar to you — I mean a memory that can at any time look back through itself.

[...] I am placing these concepts within your time scheme because in your terms they were born out of it. [...]

Am I speaking too softly?

I am in many ways a most dependable contact, with that which is beyond your physical knowledge. While I am myself, I am also intimately connected with other portions of your own personalities that exist in other dimensions. [...]

(The object for the 83rd envelope experiment was a note Jane wrote to me today; I found it on the table this noon upon returning from work, left there by Jane shortly after 11 AM. [...]

[...] Jane herself left for work at about 11:30 AM at nursery school. [...]

[...] What the question really means to most people is this: What will happen when I am not alive in physical terms any longer? [...] Most of all the question means: When I am dead, will I still be who I am now, and will I remember those who are dear to me now?

I am using your own terms here. [...]

[...] Since your bodies and your entire physical universe are composed of atoms and molecules, then I am telling you that the entire structure exists in the same manner. [...]

[...] You will have to forgive me but I am not really irritated, dear friends, with this desire for demonstrations. [...] It is only that you are so innocent and I am so amused. [...]

[...] I am hardly worried that your critical sense will dim in this or other sessions. [...]

[...] Yet not only are we on different sides of the same wires, but we are at the same time either above or below, according to your viewpoint, and if you consider the wires as forming cubes—this is for you, Joseph, with your love of images—then the cubes could also fit one within the other without disturbing the inhabitants of either cube one iota; and these cubes are also within cubes, which are themselves within cubes, and I am speaking now of only the small particle of space taken up by your plane and mine.

[...] I have more senses, so to speak, in operating use that is, than you have, because not only am I aware of my own plane but of yours and other parallel planes, even though I myself have not existed in some of those parallel planes.

[...] I think I am that way. [...]

(Lately I’ve really been working with ideas of safety, saying and believing that I am safe, secure and supported and that I do trust my natural spontaneous motion.... [...]

Ruburt’s idea did come from me, about your reincarnational episodes, and your personal experience illustrates what I am saying in the book—the individual’s history is written in the psyche, and can indeed be uncovered. [...]

[...] 12:04 AM.

[...] I am obviously dictating this book, speaking through Ruburt, while Joseph sits on the couch across from a very specific coffee table, taking down my words.

[...] Otherwise you would not understand what I am trying to say.

[...] I am, however, here, whether or not I am speaking, and approachable. [...]

I announce my presence simply to let you know that I am here, and have been. [...]

[...] To answer one letter would draw its author to our doorstep at once: “I am your Seth,” and: “I will visit you as soon as I hear from you.” [...]

[...] Often I remind myself that each note I write in connection with the Seth books, or send to a correspondent, represents my attempt as I compose it to grasp a little bit better the interior and exterior realities I am creating for myself. [...]

[...] I am not using symbols in such statements, and hidden within them are important homey clues. [...]

[...] In the meantime know that I am present whether or not I speak, and I am approachable for your help or questions. [...]

[...] Again according to those rhythms of which I speak—but know that I am present nevertheless. [...]

[...] I am taking it for granted that you understand that I am referring to the ‘mental attitude’ of animals and of the body consciousness, for they do possess their own mental attributes—psychological colorations—and above all, emotional ‘states.’”

[...] You must understand that I am not saying that you are passive, fleeting dreamers, lost in some divine mind, but that you are the unique creative manifestations of a divine intelligence whose creativity is responsible for all realities, which are themselves endowed with creative abilities of their own, with the potential and desire for fulfillment—inheritors indeed of the divine processes themselves. [...]

I am following through, you see. [...]

I am bringing this up because of the discussion in class relating to nonevents. [...]

I am not saying that nonevents are only potential events, however. [...]

[...] I am too excited.”

“I don’t want anyone to think I am frivolous.”

“No one is to think I am a hysterical female.”