“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Already, though, I am struck by the insights on art and life as they are presented.

I am going to suggest a series of exercises. [...]

[...] This involves questions like “How different am I from my neighbor? [...]

[...] So in this work I am presenting you not only with probabilities as conjecture, but, often, showing you how such probabilities affect your daily lives, and giving examples of the ways in which Ruburt’s and Joseph’s lives have been so touched.

[...] In the 15th session Seth told Jane and me: “I am giving you what may be considered a broad outline to be filled in.”

(I’m getting used to thinking about Mass Events now, and am organized to start producing the notes for it—something like making myself a new nest within which I can feel comfortable for working on the new job.

There is another consideration involving medicine; though as I mentioned earlier (in the 624th session from Chapter Five), if you accept Western medical beliefs I am not suggesting that you suddenly forsake all doctors. [...]

You barely touch the surfaces of the kind of freedom that I am speaking of, though you certainly do far better than most.

[...] Again, I am aware of the contradiction that seems to be presented to your minds. [...]

[...] Then perhaps what I am about to explain will make more sense.

[...] I am not speaking of evil possibilities, but that man must realize that he is responsible for his acts, whether they are called good or evil.

[...] I am speaking of our books only—not, for example, of novels or other “occult” tracts.

I am not solving dilemmas for you this evening, but giving you a head start with your beliefs (humorously). [...]

I am not going to tell you to go or not to go. [...]

Now: I am, as I have told you often myself, independent of Ruburt. [...]

If this information becomes available in the dream state you may then say, “I am frightened of dreams. [...]

[...] I am speaking specifically of the brain, as separated from the mind, to emphasize the point that these abilities are of creaturehood. [...]

I am explaining this for now in terms of past, present, and future. [...]

[...] I am speaking in very simple terms now, and yet those involved in a flood, for example, want the past washed away, or want to be flooded by bursts of vital emotions such as disasters often bring. [...]

[...] I am, I admit, personifying our cell here, but the statement has a firm truth. [...]

(9:44.) It is certainly too simple to say what I am going to say, yet it is almost as if you would be better off turning the entire rational approach upside down, taking it for granted that all of its assumptions were false, for they are indeed more false than true (intently). [...]

I am making generalizations here, but each individual case should be looked at in its own light. [...]

[...] Sometimes over the years, in my frustration at being unable to find a certain line or passage in a session, or in something Jane or I have written, I’ve ended up thinking that I merely imagined its being: “It doesn’t really exist at all,” I’ve told myself, “so why am I wasting my time looking for it?” Yet once I start hunting, it’s difficult to stop until I’ve exhausted all reasonable chances of finding what I want. [...]

[...] In Chapter 8 of Dreams, when I asked Seth what he was going to do for the rest of the evening (in our terms), he replied: ‘I am going to refresh myself by diving into some new concepts, for there are new concepts for me also, of course, and I dive into them from many positions all the time as well.’ (See the conclusion of Session 916 for May 14, 1980.) Think of the questions one could ask him relative to just this one statement! [...]