“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Yet as the approach of the scientific age appeared, before its blossoming, so new tendencies are now showing that do indeed signal a new era, in which the emotions and intellect are no longer regarded as opposing tendencies in man.

[...] The “New Aquarian Age” may be an exaggeration, and about it are grouped many distorted ideas—yet it is a popular term that stands for an insight on the part of the people, and is a result of quite valid inner knowledge that an era is ending, and that another has to some extent already begun.

[...] And learn the significance—the meaning behind the fact that your daughter and your sister are approximately the same age, and you will. [...]

[...] Don’t speak to me of youth and age. [...]

[...] The second, like the first, was for sale because of age. An elderly couple recently moved from the second house to a home for the aged. [...]

[...] All of the different variations that can be played upon human consciousness, all of the racial probabilities, are in one way occurring in ages past — but they are also happening in what you think of as your present. [...]

[...] He is now in a home for the aged, but well cared for.

[...] 1947 is mentioned, the year she met the child’s father; the age 17 is mentioned; she was 17 when she met him: a school connection mentioned and she was still in school at the time.

(My remarks came about in response to Jane’s wondering comments about what, if any, part beliefs could play in one getting so ill at such a young age. [...]

[...] It would deteriorate with age.

[...] Very approximately here, his age—because of the hair color I am not sure—maybe 47 to 67, for his face is not old though his hair is white.

[...] He is closer to the 47-year age limit, and has whitish hair. [...]

[...] Mary Miller is the same age as Jane’s mother.

[...] They do not even seem to be mistakes until you are “at the next level” of development, or a step higher in your understanding—as when, say, in the sixth grade you looked back and saw a page of your own childish lettering done at the age of five. [...]

[...] Seagull’s middle-aged lady focused it further. (Bach’s description of Jane for Time.) The middle-aged lady was mentioned as middle-aged, and as a psychic, poet and science fiction writer—a turning of the ways in that the psychic books were mentioned, but no books of poetry, which gave impetus to Dialogues.

[...] At the same time his age bothered him. [...]

[...] Jane speculated that it could refer to the age of either the publicity director of F. Fell, or to Rhoda Monks, the author of letter # 2. Jane telephoned Frederick Fell on February 8th, and in so doing spoke first to Rhoda Monks; to Jane she sounded as though she could be about that age.

The four three refers to the age, either of Rhoda Monks, or the man who sent the request for the social security number. They are both approximately of the same age.

(Marian and her husband went to school to see the teacher, a middle-aged woman. [...]

[...] There are wonders here, wonders in your own reality, that we helped build in other ages in your time. [...]

It is quite true, however, that in the wild many animals protect and provide for wounded or disabled members, and that the wisdom that comes with age is indeed appreciated even in the animal kingdom. [...]

This was one of the reasons for the decay of knowledge and learning in the Middle Ages. There were personalities reincarnated during the Middle Ages who had lived during the Roman experience, however they were not leading personalities and they were not able to transmit knowledge or abilities from past lives, simply because they had not the inherent strength or capability needed.

The Middle Ages represented such a break, and I also suggest a break.

When the Middle Ages began a large number of personalities who had lived before and during the Roman period were ready to end their reincarnation cycles. [...]

[...] No one of either age, for instance, was present. [...] We were not sure Seth even intended a reference to age. There is a 10 difference between the two numbers, and also between the ages of Jane and me.

[...] It does not age during a projection; that is, the body does not age. [...]

[...] Josef was not able to paint anything worthwhile past the age of 40, and he turned to a land-owner’s province.

[...] You wanted to express in painting then the freeing of emotions—that could not be expressed unless first there had been repression, and those energies in full blossom that have nothing to do with age.

[...] Do not fall for the trashy concepts concerning age—particularly in relationship to art, for there there is far less correlation than there might seem to be, for example, in conventional terms in other areas of life.

Many of the most important art works have been done late in life, as you should know, and blossoming of the psyche cannot be given any age limit. [...]

4. It took me a while to realize that Seth had made a most interesting statement here—implying that somehow I’d picked up Floyd’s worries about his age and virility. [...] I enjoy and appreciate my age and virility each day without being concerned about them, yet my dream certainly revealed that on other levels I’m at least speculating about such issues. [...]

In that dream your worries were initially reflected—worries that your friend Floyd has also encountered on his own about virility and age,⁴ so you saw the two of you in a five-and-ten-cent store, simply representing the world of commerce, where items are sold: Did you still have a value in that world? [...]

[...] I presume his trade has advanced in stature and proficiency through the ages. [...]

[...] See page 49.), and died at the age of 9. I do not believe that the church is still standing or that any records will be found. [...]

[...] I see him also England 13th century, as a shepherd dying at the age of 33. [...]

[...] (Pause, hand raised.) I am concerned over your arbitrary idea of age and advancement in terms of what you should expect at your age. [...]

He feels that 45, for him, is a significant age, and so it is, for there he picks up some strands of knowledge that he had, but was not free enough to use, earlier. And as I recall, the same occurred to you at that age, Joseph. [...]

[...] You cannot speak to your age, your time, unless you understand it, and you cannot understand it unless at one time or another you feel the weight of its authoritative beliefs. [...]