“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] (I told him more than once along the way that he’d better think twice—and more!— before taking on the job of publishing eight-to-ten books.) Jane died on September 5,1984, at the age of 55. [...]

[...] Age is some detriment in that sort of adjustment.

[...] They are indeed afraid of aging, and so press onward in more and more exterior activity, because they fear that age will show itself there first. [...]

[...] It erupted suddenly at the age of 45 and ran for 10 years. [...]

[...] (I was surprised at the age, etc.) For some time in your relationship in this life, Nebene provided you with a framework to contain your own early emotions with your parents.

([Mark:] “We all have responsibilites such as aging parents that we take care of.”)

Now do not bring me down in this particular subject to specifics this evening because you can help aged parents out of a feeling of vengeance and be very glad that you are strong and they are weak and take great unholy pride over the idea that you are finally stronger than they are. [...]

The one stability between self and what is notself, and the one and only difference, is not an identity that is part and parcel of constantly changing physical framework, not the outer ego whose conception of who it is constantly changes, according to its age and environment, but the inner self behind all physical constructions.

[...] Telling myself I would visit Ed and Ella, I then glimpsed a teen-age girl talking on the telephone. [...]

[...] According to Seth, Emerson is one of the “Speakers” — personalities who, both in the physical state and out of it, speak to man through the ages, reminding him of inner knowledge so that it is never really forgotten. [...]

The child may go from one illness to another, or simply display an odd disinclination for life — a lack of enthusiasm, until finally in some cases the child dies at an early age. [...]

[...] Anne had a sister, died at a very young age… a baptism… a rosary…Blanche Adele… Anne wore blue and a note…”

[...] It sprouts everywhere, at any age, with seemingly new opportunities and fulfillments, whenever it is given the chance.

[...] While in this state, I had repeated visions of a man, an aged man in robes, standing before an ancient wall. [...]

[...] Jane was recommended to them by Ray Van Over; they wanted information on the death and attendant circumstances of their son Michael, who died last month at a little over 3 years of age.

[...] He had begun to speak at but a few months age. [...]

[...] Some of this has to do with the symbolism you have attached subconsciously to the age of 40, and you see yourself coming closer to it. [...]

[...] Then you became frightened after the age of 35, and you began to soften up your blows. [...]

[...] Disease of any kind, as well as aging itself, would have to be controlled absolutely.

[...] “I wouldn’t mind seeing the age of 100, though, if I were in good shape,” Jane said as we discussed this note. [...]

[...] I said it’s too bad the young don’t have the insight to stress their capabilities regardless of the opinions of others — but such thinking comes with age, usually, I’m afraid.

[...] If you are as lively as I am at my age, then you can indeed sing hosannas... [...]

‘You were somewhat younger-looking there, too — she is about forty and you, Rob, are fifty in that place, but age doesn’t matter to you there. [...]

They looked like bloated, bitter copies of us, at a later age. [...]

[...] To them, however, they were the age that you were at the point of their breakoff. [...]

[...] three children who died before the age of three, and records, I believe, attesting to this fact—couched in one of the historical societies—or in land grant information. [...]

[...] As our friend here went beyond the point (referring to Theodore), looked at the portraits and consciously—for you did not make an original, intuitive, judgment—but consciously looked at these portraits in terms of nationality, age and all the requirements that you thought of. [...]

Seth didn’t mention it in the session tonight, but Jane and I find it extremely interesting that just last week much national publicity was given to the ongoing two-year-old controversy among cancer specialists over whether women — especially those under 50 years of age — should be given routine mammograms (X-ray examinations) in efforts to detect breast cancer in its early stages.

[...] For example: Scientific advisers to the government’s National Cancer Institute, which is conducting elaborate studies of many thousands of women of varying ages, have called for a halt to the routine screening of younger women. [...]

[...] I found myself thinking about the cancer being a new, explosive growth within a body that was aging. [...]