“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] (If you want to believe that Seth is an unconscious production of mine, then you must admit he lends himself rather well to the unconscious purposes of others and possesses a reality to them quite independent of his relationship to me. [...]

[...] He has mellowed in his attitude toward my youngest sister, also.] We got spanked when we misbehaved, which is something I’ve always been ashamed to admit to others. [...]

(I had to admit my hand was pretty tired and cramped by now, but inertia helped. [...]

[...] There are ways to use dreams purposefully, however, to improve our existence, even though I admit that the last instance was not a very good example.

[...] I blush to admit the fact, but at one time I did call you Yo-Yo (see the excerpts for the 27th session).

[...] Ruburt is as “detailed” about his own working habits as you both admit you are in yours. [...]

Jane and I try to keep in mind Seth’s ideas, as well as our own, concerning the great challenges our species has chosen to deal with these days, but I must admit that we often have trouble doing so. [...]

I admit that for some mysterious reason of my own I let Bill Baker, as I’ll call that youngish individual, fool me when he knocked on our back-porch door yesterday afternoon. [...]

[...] When she began writing Magical Approach, she even surprised me by occasionally helping me get breakfast, cooking bacon and eggs at the hot plate I’d set up for her some seven months ago on the kitchen table.⁴ Although she could work at the table while sitting down, she’d given up those simple, nurturing acts of food preparation many weeks ago; her fingers weren’t working well enough, she told me at the time; she didn’t trust herself enough to handle hot food—and I admit that when she implied a risk, the chance of an accident, I stopped encouraging her to help me with meals.

[...] You will exist whether or not I admit that you are real. [...]

“While I admit that many people will not agree with me, I know from experience that most individuals do not choose one ‘happy’ life after another, always ensconced in a capable body, endowed by nature or heritage with all of the gifts most people seem to think they desire.

[...] That I could relax now, admitting and realizing that I did have certain fears per the sinful self’s document (instead of pretending that I didn’t). [...]

[...] And incidentally it is also much more logically a part of these theories, although both Priestley and Dunne would be unable I believe to admit this.

[...] At the same time, I admit that ideas like this always remind me of Seth’s comments in the class session for June 23, 1970, as excerpted in the Appendix for Seth Speaks:)

I do admit that in recent years I’ve wondered more and more why artists don’t deal with at least their own past-life images. [...]