“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Half our problem, we saw in a discussion before the guests arrived, was that we had no planned response for such situations: we ended up feeling guilty at saying no, and resentful at saying yes. [...]

(“Yes.”)

(“Yes.”)

Yes, indeed. [...]

(“Yes.”

[...] “But I’ve done introductions for Seth’s books, so why shouldn’t he do one for mine?” And yes, the Cézanne material mentioned earlier — see Jane’s introduction for Psyche — had developed into a full-fledged book of its own.

[...] No commitments have been made, and I’m anxious that Jane consider whether she even wants the interview, as well as the questions that would then arise, should she answer yes.

People felt depersonalized beneath labels, so that they were told: “Oh, yes, you are a victim of ulcers, or anxiety attacks, or whatever,” while the very personal suffering portion of their beings was ignored. [...]

(“Yes. [...]

For Ruburt once more: Yes, you are perfectly safe with your cat, if you both proceed with your present course.

(“Yes.”

(Yes. [...]

([John and Rob:] “Yes.”)

(“Yes.”)

(“Yes,” I said, although every so often I had to ask Seth to repeat a word or phrase.)

(“Yes.”)

(“Yes. [...]

(“Yes.”)

(“Yes, I’d like to do that.”)

([Ron:] “Yes, but I don’t necessarily agree with the logic of your answers.”)

([Gert:] “Yes.”