“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] In a fashion a drought is partially caused by the emotional states of the people who experience it — yet a drought is not a disease. [...]

[...] Your whole attitude showed the young man, however, that he was the one who must examine his own beliefs, and without immediately panicking him you showed by inference your own belief that his delusion was doing him considerable harm.

(“Can you tell us who will publish it?”)

[...] Where were all those “guides” who were supposed to come running to your aid when you got in predicaments like this? [...]

[...] The thing was actually a rather clumsy lower-dimensional animal, a provoked dumb dog of other dimensions who then attacked him, symbolically enough, by biting. [...]

“For one thing … those who know existence on the physical level now, have, because of certain cycles, lived before at approximately the same historical periods. [...]

[...] With this he started laughing, but in a friendly open manner, as did the others who now gathered around.

Now we have another man, who is also contemplative and determined—but this man is pursued by time. [...]

With your projects of the past finished, the “man who needed a job” had no job. [...]

[...] There are people in any organization who are in the habit of sloppy work. There are also people in any organization who have fairly decent standards of excellence. [...]

(Last August Jane received a letter from Nelson Hayes, who was one of her professors at Skidmore. [...]

[...] The men who have succeeded within it, the inventors for example, never really fit within its confines. [...]

[...] Mr. Wrigley, the physician’s assistant who had called a couple of weeks ago, also visited today to check upon Jane’s decubiti [which are doing well, by the way], so he was here when Peggy arrived. [...]

[...] And once again, as we waited I thought that I was the one who’d initiated events this evening, whereas I had trouble understanding why Jane didn’t do more of that herself. [...]

(Richard Bach and his editor, Eleanor Friede, who witnessed the 618th session for September 28, 1972. [...]

[...] The Robert Browning reference concerns a letter Dick received from someone [a medium?] who told him that he’d been Robert Browning in a previous life.

[...] Christianity has believed in a heaven and a hell, a purgatory, and reckoning; and so, at death, to those who so believe in these symbols, another ceremony is enacted, and the guides take on the guises of those beloved figures of Christian saints and heroes.

This “life-symbolization” may be adopted by those who gave little thought to self-examination during their lifetime. [...]

Is Seth actually my trance personality, though — a native of timeless psychological realms, who sends his messages to our time-tinted world? [...]

[...] It purported to come from the “world view” of Paul Cézanne, the famous French artist who died at the start of this century.

[...] The coordinates that link you with others who are more or less of your kind have to do with psychic and psychological intersections that result in a like space-time framework.

[...] The other day Ruburt received a telephone call from a woman in California who was in difficulty. [...]

[...] His material is also an extension of much that he gave in the 679th session for Volume 1 of “Unknown” Reality, when he discussed the early background of the probable Jane who chose to live in this physical reality, and how that Jane began to contend with her strongly mystical nature. [...]

[...] He was not sure enough of his new world; he was still enough a part of the old one so that he often saw his life and abilities through the eyes of the “old world inhabitants” — the others who might scorn him, or set him up for ridicule.¹³ They represented portions of his own psyche still at that level of consciousness, not having quite assimilated the greater knowledge or experience, so he felt he needed protection — the protection that would … cleverly … serve all of his purposes, allowing him to go ahead as he wanted to … that would keep him at home working, and yet also serve as a control against too much inner spontaneity until he learned that he could indeed trust the new world of experience.

Supposedly it was here where she met her husband, who was a foreman in the plant. [...]

[...] She was highly amused at the plight of the clergymen of different faiths, who had died, because the circumstances were so different than those they had expected.

[...] He would in no way lose consciousness of who he was, and he would perceive these experiences again, somewhat in the same manner that you perceive heat and cold. [...]

[...] To sum up first, we saw that Seth had used the name of the artist who had executed the block print, Roy Fox, as a starting point for data involving Jane and Roy and me, but for some reason had not dealt with the test object itself. [...]

[...] They did appear: Judy and Lee Wright, who witnessed the unscheduled 129th session, incidentally, that was held that same evening, February 7,1965. [...]

[...] The situation was common knowledge, so no confidences are violated to say that at the time Roy was keeping company with a woman who was separated from her husband, but not divorced. [...]

[...] The friend who took the photo caught me by surprise during a lunch hour; hence my position in the act of stretching, and the startled expression.

[...] Now the I who experiences probable events, not chosen for experience in the physical universe, has the same kind of identity and memory as this dream self. [...]

[...] And two others, who had been in the room, were on the stairway.

[...] Perhaps the initials of the man who lives here.

[...] There is an office close by in the same dwelling place, that also belongs to the owner, the man who Dr. Instream visits.

[...] She wants to be regarded as a desirable woman who happens to be your wife and a mother.

(“Who knows? [...]

[...] “Well, for someone who wasn’t with it too much, I did okay,” Jane said. [...]

I should emphasize that it would be better for you not to play with tables at all, except here or in the company of others who are already familiar with such work.

[...] What we need are more skeptics who are not afraid to judge the claims of science with the same fine discrimination used to examine other alternate disciplines and fields of endeavor. [...]