“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] While they were here, we received a call from Tam’s secretary, Nancy, who told us that she’d just mailed special delivery Tam’s corrected version of the letter to Ariston that I’d sent him on Monday. [...]

(We were also visited at 11:30 AM by George Rhoads, who left shortly after the Danahers arrived.

PEOPLE WHO ARE FRIGHTENED OF THEMSELVES

[...] Let us take a hypothetical individual — one who is convinced he has a healthy body, and is proud of mental stability. [...]

[...] (Pause.) There were indeed problems within the firm, and the editor who liked the book was let go and unable to follow through as she would have liked.

[...] Some people who read our other books are afraid to read the Seven ones—for if Ruburt writes fiction, which means not fact, then they fear the line between fact and fiction blurs, and where is the Truth, in capital letters?

[...] I am not putting down the species in any way, yet it is true to say that (pause) people who are beyond their time, or ahead of it, cannot expect most people to accept their ideas so readily.

[...] Surely her intuitively-chosen manner helped us acclimate to the highly original and creative fact that Jane was learning to speak in a dissociated (or trance) state for Seth, a disembodied worthy who called himself an “energy personality essence.” [...]

[...] I’m proud to be involved in this work with Rick and his wife, Anne Marie O’Farrell, who is my literary agent. [...]

[...] I don’t know who would have the patience to read them, but I’d really like to see all of them out there, on the record. [...]

When she was 33 she was more youthful appearing than women much younger who were forced to work in the fields. [...]

[...] Here he was a woman of some artistic ability, the mother of two sons, one who had been connected with him in the past.

[...] In the past he hated the man who took away the daughter.

[...] A man or a woman who has strong and definite mental deficiencies... who has strong negative habits... [...]

[...] particularly to our merchant from Venice who is going to travel afar.

[...] Now various kinds of lacks can show up in many ways—in mental deficiencies—a man or a woman who has strong and definite mental deficiencies—who has strong negative habits—such a person has blocks in those areas. [...]

Now, I will bid you a fond good evening—particularly to our Merchant from Venice (to Daniel) who is going to travel afar. [...]

One letter from someone who wrote saying that The Seth Material contributed to a nervous breakdown is a case in point.

This was because he had for one thing watched what he thought of as the two faces of Father Doran, who conned others in his preaching then showed quite opposing characteristics afterward. [...]

[...] A concerted effort should be made to gain the support of the part of him who understands. [...]

An individual who completely accepted what was going on here, and Seagull without question, could (underlined) also possess a fervor that would, or could, overstate the case, rouse instead within people conflicting beliefs. [...]

[...] He will be known as an excellent writer in his own right, and as one who produces our material, which he will be in a position to give freely to the world.

[...] You ask, who is the giver?

[...] (Pause.) The part of the self who considered the symptoms necessary, you see, has realized they are no longer necessary, but still some habit persists.

[...] It now no longer exists, but they still resent the breaking up; and Ruburt’s yells, quite involuntary, represented in fact the death throes of the symptoms, and the part of the self who had accepted them as an attempt to solve problems.

The uterus (pause) impression had to do with Vivian (Crowder) I believe (pause), and Ruburt picked it up from your mother, who is not consciously aware of the knowledge. [...]

[...] The passage referred to a biblical Seth, and to a Seth who was an Egyptian god, who ended up as a daemon, etc.)

[...] It is indeed the spontaneous self, as he is now realizing, who is the guardian.

[...] You must try to avoid an overconcentration now upon the negative simply because you are looking for symptoms with the people who come to you. [...]

([Joel:] “Who were you pointing to when you said that somebody over here had something else to work out. [...]

(To Daniel.) And for our friend over here, and not really for him but for our long-faced friend who is not present tonight (meaning Ron), Ruburt will go for any tests that are fun. [...]

The individuals who have to one extent or another perceived Framework 2 have, then, described it according to their own brief visits, taking it for granted “that the part was a representative sample of the whole.” [...]

[...] Dream periods provide that service, of course, so that in dreams the two egos can meet and merge to some extent, comparing notes like strangers who perhaps meet on a train at night, and are amazed to discover, after some conversation, that they are indeed close relatives, each embarked upon the same journey though seemingly they travelled alone.

[...] It contains, therefore, the inner ego of each individual who has lived or will ever live upon the earth.

Another person will become involved, who is not connected with Prentice-Hall. [...]

(The call was from Callista Buffalin, a widow now in her late twenties, who had lived in our apartment house until about two years ago. [...]

Some additional problems for the woman who called, and marriage to a man with something wrong with a leg, perhaps only a slight limp. [...]

[...] Although they bear my name, before I was finished with them I’d had plenty of help from my wife, Jane Roberts, and from Seth, the nonphysical entity who speaks through her while she’s in trance. In fact, Jane and Seth are the ones who so beautifully bring these notes to their conclusion; and in that order — Jane with some excellent material about her relationship with Seth, and Seth himself with his new letter to correspondents. [...]

The firm decision to do this was made when we were visited by Jane’s editor at Prentice-Hall, Tam Mossman, and a business colleague who accompanied him. [...]

[...] Part of my paragraph of commentary following the 724th session, in Volume 2, fits in here: “As he [Seth] quite humorously commented in the 14th session for January 8, 1964, ‘… for you have no idea of the difficulties involved in explaining time to someone who must take time to understand the explanation.’ Yet Seth’s simultaneous time isn’t an absolute, for, as he also told us in that session: ‘While I am not affected by time on your plane, I am affected by something resembling time on my plane … To me time can be manipulated, used at leisure and examined. [...]

[...] It may be natural enough for us in the West not to enjoy the idea of surrendering our individual natures upon physical death, even if intellectually we can understand, for instance, the Buddhist teaching that “perfect” joy can be found in the eventual, blissful surrender of the self to a supreme spirit — although I note with some humor that personally I’ve yet to determine how the self who surrenders knows it’s done so if it’s been so thoroughly absorbed.

Something about the third man who could possibly be in control or something—definitely won’t be. [...]

[...] Who else did we know, so “old school” who’d even speak of tipping one’s hat, or refer to food as “good cuisine?” Anyway he certainly didn’t sound frightening, and the fifth-dimensional monologue was really provocative.

[...] We did think that more than two people should be involved, though, so we decided to ask Bill Macdonell to join us, since he was the only one who knew of our experiments. [...]

[...] Her voice dropped considerably in volume and I really had the sensation that she was indeed speaking for someone else (rather than for a subconscious personality, for example, who just called itself Seth).

[...] Who or what was he? [...]

They definitely open the eyes of many who would otherwise pay no attention. Particularly in the race question they have performed a great psychic service, for they have aroused deep, creative, constructive emotions on the part of people who otherwise would not have been involved. [...]

[...] The man who is capable of joy is capable, to a large extent, of changing his world. [...]

[...] Another visitor that first day was Jim Beckett, who witnessed the 47th and 49th sessions. [...]

(Philip of course is the entity name for John Bradley, who has witnessed several sessions. [...]

There is a June date here insofar as your knowledge of the development is concerned, and there are two partners, or two allied men within your firm who will break apart.

[...] There are two regional managers in the Searle organization who are brothers-in-law. [...]

[...] There’s a woman connected with him, a sister, who helps him somehow. [...]

[...] A guy who’s a jokester. [...]

[...] It is not a cult in the terms that people often consider material that seems to come from a source beyond the individual who gives it.

[...] This material is legitimate, speaks for itself, and I will not embellish an otherwise sensible and excellent performance with circus tactics to impress those who will not be impressed under any circumstances.

Imagine a man in an automobile who passes our man at the corner. [...]

[...] This particular path exists in space for man A, who is at the corner. [...]