“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Now, I am here to welcome back a certain member of our group who had to leave the group for several reasons—and read me correctly in this particular instance where my friend Ruburt did not read me correctly (addressed to Rachel). [...]

[...] It is Ruburt who is in a Jane trance most of the time. [...]

[...] You would just have another expansion of consciousness, another self-who-is-aware-of-being in the same way that — using an analogy, granted — the writer is aware of the self who lives, in those terms; is the self who lives while being in a position of some apartness, able to comment upon the life being lived.

[...] The first person I talked to was our friend Sue Watkins, who has attended ESP class almost from the time Jane started it in 1967. [...]

[...] My addition, now, to those remarks is this: You would need the creation then of another “self,” who stood aside from the writing self in order to preserve the original intent.

2. A note added a month later: My surprise over the double-dream phenomenon continues, for by now I know of nine people (including Sue Watkins and myself), who have experienced either the same thing or closely related versions of it. [...]

Inspiration, however, in its appearance is spontaneous, and those who possess it have their problems if they want to make such inspiration available to the world. There are those who can go from one spontaneous inspiration happily to another equally spontaneous one, and feel no desire to form any kind of art from it, or to order it along the ways of the world.

[...] The younger man was, when you met him, afraid himself of schizophrenia, and had a great need to establish his own sanity at the expense of anyone who showed any but the most conventional characteristics.

[...] You also sought to form a contact with someone more or less a contemporary, who was in the psychological field.

[...] The teachers within your system are those who are in their last reincarnation, and other personalities who have left the system but have been assigned to help those still within it. [...]

[...] The facts should be clear to any person who has ever experienced a valid precognitive dream, clairvoyant event, or telepathic communication.

As to who or what Seth is, his term “energy essence personality” seems as close to the answer as anyone can get. I don’t believe he is a part of my subconscious, as that term is used by psychologists, or a secondary personality. [...]

[...] I do think that Seth is part of another entity, and that he is something quite different from, say, a friend who has “survived” death.

[...] The given date was correct, and the article goes on to tell about a young priest, Father Fernandes (F and R—the abbreviation for “Father” is Fr.), who was on a mission in this country to get funds to modernize the seminary. [...] The article speaks of the three children who saw the apparition at Fatima, and Seth mentioned a child.

[...] He had no idea who it was. Later one of my students, George, picked out the painting as a portrait of a personality called Bega, who communicates with him through automatic writing. [...]

[...] The salesman who waited on us became quite talkative when he learned that Rob was going to use the Masonite for paintings. [...]

[...] We believe that this was a reference to World War II, when the salesman who waited on us had his portrait done as a soldier. [...]

If you do not like what you see, then who is to blame? [...]

[...] You may look back to a time and remember no identity, and you wonder: Who was I then, and how did I come here?

And yet a portion of you knows the answer, and a portion of you knows who you are, and the memories of your previous lives are not in your genes or in your chromosomes, but in the psychic reality that forms the genes and the chromosomes. [...]

Those of you who would change your world, then I tell you, listen: for if you would change your world you must listen to the voice within yourself. [...]

[...] Some people who consider suicide believe in life after death, and some do not — and in the deepest of terms all deaths are somewhat suicidal. [...]

[...] Many people who commit suicide feel to the contrary that they are no longer needed, or in fact that their very existence stands in the way of other people’s happiness. [...]

[...] In many cases it is the son and daughter of the upper middle-classes, or the well-to-do, who run into such life-endangering dilemmas. [...]

[...] A person may become so frightened of using his or her own power of choice or action that the construction of an artificial superbeing is created — a seemingly sublime personage who gives orders to the individual involved.

Donald may be so terrified of making choices, so indecisive, that he constructs an imaginary superbeing who orders him to do thus and so. [...]

[...] In such circumstances an individual might then construct an artificial devil or demon who annoys him constantly, and even orders acts of a highly destructive nature.

[...] And what about children who die young, or servicemen killed in war? [...]

[...] I do not give readings or sessions for the public (nor do I charge fees or accept contributions), so the reincarnational readings were those we had for students, friends, or for those who had asked for assistance in a particularly tragic problem. [...]

[...] … He was not a child taken before his promise was achieved, but a personality who left you when his own reincarnations were finished. [...]

[...] Beware of those who give you ready answers. [...]

[...] Interpretations based upon the charts then will make more sense to those who have chosen the same probable birth circumstances — but they will be of no value to those who were born at the same time, in your terms, but who follow a different order of probabilities.³

[...] But as Jane has said, things are “calmer” psychically when we’re by ourselves: In trance or out, she can concentrate upon the work at hand, free of the presence of a third individual — one who is bound to radiate his or her own psychic characteristics. [...]

[...] Earlier tonight he wrote to a woman who has the same birthdate as Ruburt. [...]

3. Jane and I appear to be two of those individuals “who follow a different order of probabilities” as far as astrology is concerned. [...]

[...] It is you who project disasters into the month of April... [...] And it is you who project disasters into consciousness when those disasters occur.

[...] And there is no one who tells you what you must do. [...]

[...] And yet I will tell you, that as a frivolous female who loved to play with a ball in the bright afternoon and had no chores to perform, seemingly an idle life and seemingly a quite useless personality .... [...]

I have said this before and I will indeed say it many times again: those of you who come here, come here for a reason. [...]

[...] Miranda Charbeau, from a French side of the family, who married into an English branch, into the Franklin Bacon family of Boston. [...]

[...] Do not be afraid of old age, you who are so young, for you have been old many times before. [...]

[...] These only appear to those who exist within three-dimensional reality. [...]

[...] It is you who project disasters into the month of April—whenever disasters occur. And it is you who projects disasters into consciousness when those disasters occur. [...]

[...] And there is no one who tells you what you must do. [...]

[...] And yet I will tell you, that as a frivolous female who loved to play with a ball in the bright afternoon and had no chores to perform, seemingly an idle life and seemingly a quite useless personality—I was not burdened with intellect—and yet in that one particular life I learned more about the nature of spontaneity and joy than in many of my ponderous intellectual existences. [...]

[...] It was the Russian lady, Christina, who’s over 90. [...] Christina kept calling for Georgia, who’d taught her her name last time. [...]

(Jane didn’t eat much breakfast, except cereal, because the young girl who fed her couldn’t properly present the bacon and eggs, for some reason; Cathy’s sister. [...]

[...] Those of you who come will see more. [...]

(“Who is A A?”)

[...] It is Alexander Anare (the “e” is silent), who died in 1906 and was a friend of her family. [...]

(Jane then asked me if her book, To Hear a Dolphin, would be accepted by the publisher who now had it. I did not know consciously who the publisher was. [...]

(“Do you know many who have tried?”)

[...] At the time, she was dating a man who drank too much. [...] He’s the one who makes me feel nervous.”

[...] Seth’s ideas on this subject have been of great value to Rob and me, and to everyone who has come in contact with them. [...]

[...] I am also sure that readers who understand and follow Seth’s ideas on health will find their own greatly improved.

“And who, I ask you, would listen? [...]

Now I will let you all take a break and I give my welcome to the new people who have come to class this evening. [...]

(To Pete Sawyer.) Some who are hiding behind words because they are afraid of the inner experience, that is quite available for them. [...]

(To Joel.) For all those who have in their deepest, most sacred thoughts imagined that to be quiet was good and to be dignified was pious, then such a performance as mine should certainly make them think. [...]

[...] Its consciousness is continuous and it knows who it is and it experiences no lapses. [...]

[...] Nearly three years from this time and a connection with a woman who may help him achieve it. [...]

(Ibelieve Janet was the one who is referred to in this note. [...]

[...] After supper this evening I read a news account of the riches accruing to a nationally known popular writer, his son and daughter, who shall be nameless here. [...]

[...] These are, for example, the psychological societies, the medical or scientific groups in which people who share common interests and backgrounds have a meeting place.

[...] You avoid “the wild psychic world” of cults, semicults, and so forth, and above all you are individualists who do not play according to game rules.

[...] Ruburt could easily have given impressions concerning, say, Richard Burton, to Goodheart (Bill), who would have been initially impressed, and would have spread the word. [...]