“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Some of the people in your dreams will be actual people you know who are also projecting. [...]

(Seth’s entity, who is nameless in our terms, spoke this evening, rather than Seth. [...]

[...] It reassures muscular memory, and again, he can no longer accept himself as someone who cannot perform a certain motion.

[...] You speak, yet who speaks, and in your briefest phrase, what happens? [...]

[...] Our cat lover laughs [Seth’s nickname for Peg, who dislikes cats]. [...]

[...] I was definitely the one who was “out,” yet Seth described what I saw. [...]

[...] For if the authors say that oftentimes a subordinate or potential ego will take over control when necessary in order to insure the survival of the whole, then this implies a decision that has been made; and who has made it?

[...] Jane said she liked the brother quite well; he is the member of Maxine’s family who made an impression on her.

[...] It is Ruburt who constantly, and oftentimes bull-headedly, blocks what I have to say.

[...] There were two children then, and he is in this life closely acquainted with three individuals who were close to him in the past existence.

[...] These remarkable physical changes stem from a genetic “defect” carried by a common ancestor who lived more than a century ago. [...]

[...] (Jean Baptiste de Monet de Lamarck [1744–1829] was a French naturalist who advocated that certain modifications of an organism’s structure and function could develop in response to environmental factors, and that these “acquired characters” could be inherited. [...]

At the risk of repeating myself, your in quotes “role” to one extent was restrictive in the sexual and emotional area; you were the one who drew the line. [...]

[...] If you could not be counted upon, who could? [...]

[...] “I don’t know who’s going to read this book but they’ll sure find a lot in it to study.”

4. I doubt if by his statement Seth means that physicists are attempting to study his CU’s (see Note 2) — certainly not yet, although a few scientists who have written us thereby show that they’re familiar with Seth’s thinking here. [...]

[...] It is he who adds any other coloration here, and then reacts to those. [...]

(A A is a recently deceased personality who has helped us obtain some spectacular results during experiments with table-tipping. [...]

(Saturday, also, the nurses told us that it’s now been decided by administration that all the people who were moved out of Surgical 3 are now to be moved back first of the week. [...]

I do not want you to think that the answers to your questions lie prepackaged in the dream state, either, relatively inaccessible except to those (long pause) who possess unique talents or some secretive knowledge of the world of the occult. [...]

[...] This morning I’d written two letters to people who had sent us donations, I told Jane. [...]

(Not long after the session was over I told Jane I meant to ask Seth to comment on the vivid dream I’d had last night about the Gallaghers and an unkempt young man who was living with them. [...]

[...] And what it meant was that Israel itself was a simile for the individual —that is, one person—who was (long pause) composed of so many fantasies and dreams and prophecies and hopes and angers and fears. [...]

[...] He sees, for example, that he is also liked as a person who has certain abilities, and this is beginning to alter his beliefs about himself.

[...] Many who believe in an afterlife think that current events are thrust upon us indiscriminately. [...]

For one who felt poorly at the start of the session, Jane now said she felt fine. [...]

Jane handed the sketch back to Bill, who continued to stare into the doorway.

[...] Father Trainor was an Irish Catholic priest who visited Jane and her ill mother regularly, for years, during Jane’s grade and high school days. [...]

[...] I do not mean extra sessions for witnesses particularly, since these sessions are open to anyone who is sincerely interested. [...]

It will be thought at first that an error was made on the part of one in the ship who worked certain controls, but other data from other controls will prove that no error was made. [...]

(I thought the other personality, who is still nameless, would speak after break. [...]