“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

“First of all,” Seth said, “the physical universe itself is a conglomeration of diverse individualistic symbols, none of which means precisely the same thing to any two individuals, and in which even so-called basic qualities like color and placement in space cannot be relied upon. [...]

[...] I’ve had two particularly vivid reincarnational dreams. [...]

[...] I saw two street names and finally decided to enter the lobby of one of the hotels. [...]

“I’ve already memorized two street names,” I said. [...]

[...] You have been taught to believe in the existence of an artificial barrier between the two that does not in fact exist. [...]

(Long pause at 11:25.) Her feelings of independence are reincited, and will at last lead her to want to leave the family in general — not to cling to her “boys” (my two brothers and myself) — and they will also serve as an impetus to growth on her part not realized earlier.

[...] You two work well together. [...]

There is in the world of probabilities a good chance that you will very seriously consider marriage toward the end of a two-year period. [...]

[...] She also knew of my questions about counterparts that I’d come up with as a result of my work on The “Unknown” Reality: were Jane and I counterparts; and, to resolve a contradiction—in two different sessions in that book, were George Rhoads and I counterparts, or weren’t we? [...]

[...] In that context, two lives in one century, overlapping, seem contradictory, but I tell you all along that you live many lives at once.

[...] Jane and I suggested then, as we do now, that when possible the two Seth letters be read together, since they compliment each other so well.

[...] The two are indistinguishable.

[...] During our talk last night, I told Jane that we’d made a serious error in deciding to publish it in two volumes, with extensive notes—that there were obviously other courses of action we could have taken. [...]

[...] I suggest two sessions a week—one on thematic material, the book, or questions you might have in areas of your interest. [...]

Now, remember, try to keep two things in your mind. [...]

[...] The two of you can be of great benefit to each other, but only when you feel free to use your intellectual and intuitional abilities to their full—and do not fell hampered on either side. [...]

[...] Yesterday, on two occasions, he was quite surprised, but mildly so, to find strong phlegm in his throat. [...] Instead, you see, yesterday on two occasions he picked up the fact of his father-in-law’s illness, the phlegm in the father-in-law’s lungs and eschewing heart difficulties. [...]

[...] The two together, you see.

There will be rather large changes for both of you, beginning shortly, and in two years your entire physical situation will be altered for the better You must remember however that the material is for all of the people, not for a few.

[...] The remark I made about the inner encounter will help you reconcile the two positions.

[...] You discovered that order itself springs from spontaneity, and this is your first real attempt to bring the two together. [...]

The two diametrically opposed ideas had to merge or the man would have had no peace, and only when these opposites were united could we begin to explain his situation.

(At 11:11 I read the last two paragraphs of the material to her, but she couldn’t make any emotional connections that might explain the voice difficulty, nor could I. Jane is inordinately fond of animals. [...]

2. Two weeks after this session was held I added “[mental]” to Seth’s term, “the true physicist,” because he does refer to “mental physicists” in the next three sessions.

[...] Two months ago a prominent East Coast newspaper carried a long article about the “turmoil” and “confusion” in which modern physics finds itself because of recent discoveries on atomic and subatomic levels. [...]

[...] Note that in the last session, my notes contain no reference to Jane’s feeling that she was, however momentarily, between two worlds.)

(At this point I had two questions to ask.

[...] Malba didn’t know where the daughter was, but she did know that her son now had two boys of his own. [...]

[...] I may have confused the two names …

[...] “Two adults waiting for an invisible personality to tell them about an invisible world, waiting for instructions on how to use inner senses,” I said. [...]

In the meantime, two days after I discovered the tape, I asked Jane, “Do you want to have a session tonight?”

[...] Two weeks later I could hardly get out of my chair onto the couch or the bed. [...]

[...] Eyes closed to hold back tears of humiliation, I felt my arms lifted by an orderly (long pause), my thin belly and ribs straining in the brightly lit room, my backside lifted and supported by two other strange arms, while a third person—I don’t want to sound too vulgar—

[...] To a large extent he shared in the memory of the other two.

(“The entity was born once as John the Baptist, and then he was born in two other forms. [...]

(“Why the two names, Paul and Saul?”)

Let us go back approximately two months in your time. [...] Two months ago, however, they were attracted to “the Foster Avenue house,” as they called it (change the name if you want to). [...]

[...] Out of habit, Jane — and consequently Seth — still talked about “Unknown” Reality as being one entity, even though just five days ago we’d learned from her editor that it would be published in two volumes.

[...] As a result he has had some valuable nightly experiences, two in particular, though there are others that he does not recall. [...]

Now he tried two or three times lately to get you out of your body, but you did not respond. [...]

[...] The two fingers mentioned of my left hand were somehow different, and needed the energy, she said. [...]