“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(I told her I got a call from Sue last night, re Steve and the tape deal, and from both Pete and Steve this morning, re tapes. [...]

(She had tried to call me twice last night, but her attempts had been made while I was talking to Helen Park and Sue Watkins, evidently. [...]

(Last Monday’s session, for October 29, was held for Sue Watkins and George Rhodes. [...]

[...] Point at Sue Mullin [Watkins].)

(Sue used the term thought forms in explaining to Jane what Seth had said.)

[...] I said I’d forgotten to ask Seth to comment on my feelings about parenthood these days, especially as I’d felt them yesterday when looking at the photos of the aide Sue’s children. [...]

[...] I’m into Section 5 now; this weekend Sue Watkins is to deliver all, or nearly all, of the typed appendix material. [...]

Now let me list some of those I know personally, and who have helped Jane and her work so much: Tam Mossman, Richard Kendall and Suzanne Delisle, Sue Watkins, Debbie Harris, Laurel Davies, Janet Mills, Lynda Dahl and Stan Ulkowski, Bob Terrio, Norman Friedman, Jeff Marcus, Juan Schoch, Michael Goode. [...]

The Nebene characteristics came particularly to the fore in the transcription of my book of course, and with the encounter with your friend Sue. [...]

[...] A quick aside: your friend Sue’s behavior: she was kicking her heels up at Nebene also.

[...] As Jane and I were getting ready to eat lunch several staff people, including Cathy, Jan, Mary the head nurse, Dawn, Sue, brought in a large flat-pan cake decorated for the 30th anniversary of Jane and me. [...]

[...] We watched In Search Of, and I read to Jane the short newspaper article about the death of Newell Mullin, who is Sue Watkins’ father. [...]

[...] Seth suggested that Jane or Sue Watkins could transcribe the notes, etc., while I commented that it would be quite a job, etc.)

[...] You had friends lately disappointed in marriages and relationships (Sue and Claire). [...]

Now I do have something to say to this one (Sue W.), and that one (Jim H.), and to some extent to all of you. [...]

(Jane wondered about getting Sue Watkins to type the Rembrandt book, without any notes at all. [...]

[...] The dream experience that our friend (Sue) had was legitimate, and you were involved in it though you do not remember. [...]

([Sue:] “Again, I’d like to ask; in the context of this class, are there two personalities here who are from the same entity?”)

(The first two paragraphs were for Sue and Ned Watkins. [...]

(Present January 13, 1970: Sue, Ned, Rose, Sally [and guest], Rachel, Florence, Vera, Theodore, and Brad, and Lydia.)

[...] One ESP class member, Sue Watkins, saw Seth in the room, etc.)

(Sue Watkins has offered to help with the mail, but I don’t know what to do —guess I’m afraid that once it’s out of our house and hands the situation would turn into a mess. [...]