“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

She will not listen to reason, because reason would rob her of her rage, and all of her vitality is now in her rage. [...]

[...] “Well, I’ll see, Rob. [...]

Those people look to cults of various kinds, where decisions are made for them, where they are relieved of the burden of an individuality that has been robbed of its sense of power by conflicting beliefs. [...]

([Sue:] “Are you giving Jane and Rob information about the personality characteristics of the probable selves of my dream?”)

[...] Energy given in commitment will rob the symptoms. [...]

This attitude is twice as limiting since it robs you of the very enjoyable and natural sense of worth that your body and mind both inherently possess—that is, overall you realize the rightness of your position. [...]

[...] Then, Note 3 for the 688th session contains my statement that in an appendix for Session 711, “I assemble from various sessions information on the complex relationships involving Jane-Ruburt-Seth [and also Rob-Joseph].”

(To me [Rob]:) Now I hope you will understand me intuitively, for what I have said [tonight] confounds the intellect to some considerable degree. [...]

[...] “We [Rob and I] both know that some sessions seem more ‘immediate’ than others, and now as Seth continued we saw why,” Jane wrote in Chapter 20. [...]

As I have told you, projection is involved to some extent, both on my part and Ruburt’s. Your (Rob’s) own presence is also important, whether or not you are present at any given session … Now when you watch, say, educational television, you see the teacher, and he speaks. [...]

[...] When you say nothing he uses this as an excuse, thinking: “Rob has said nothing, therefore he must agree with what I am doing.” [...]

ROB USING THE MAGICAL APPROACH.

[...]

2. “Rob wanted me to do a paragraph or so about my reactions to the book on scientific creationism that I’ve just finished reading,” Jane wrote, “so here goes. [...]

[...] (Referring to Rob’s Seth protrait.)

[...] His abilities and powers are so great that others, seemingly now, try to rob him of them. [...]

[...] It is bad enough to believe that you are at the mercy of one past, but to consider yourself helpless before innumerable previous errors from other lives puts you in an impossible situation; the conscious will is robbed of its power to act. [...]

([Sue:] “Can Jane and Rob perceive this?”)

[...] By now, did those photographs actually depict the immature images of us, the Jane and Rob we knew and had always been, or from our standpoint did they show a probable Jane, a probable Rob — two individuals who long ago had set out upon their own journeys through other realities? [...]

When you hassle your abilities, when you compare what you think of as your drive unfavorably with what you think of as the superior drive of others, you are denying the integrity of your own natural individuality, and robbing your abilities of your own blessings. [...]

[...] “My God, Rob, it’s almost midnight,” she exclaimed. [...]

[...] In the back of his mind he wondered about James, mainly because he knew that Joseph (Rob) enjoyed one of James’s books.

[...] “Yet it might be fun now and then to look at the daily events in our lives first, as recorded in Rob’s notes — and see the dictation in the sessions as emerging from those humble sources. [...]

“I’m getting something, Rob. [...]

(After reading my typed interpretations of the long sounds she’d started to deliver at 10:22, Jane wrote: “I knew what the drawn-out words were at the beginning, and thought Rob had understood them. [...]

(Part one: A table tipping session on Wednesday, November 22, 1967, in our living room, with the following: Jane and Rob, and Claire Crittenden and Carl Watkins. [...]