“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In our recent session with Philip, otherwise known as John Bradley, we also hit some specific points. [...]

[...] One in particular that involved again Philip, or John Bradley.

[...] I do want to have on record my own comments concerning my warning to Philip, or John Bradley, and the implications that are involved. [...]

[...] My greetings to our friend, Philip (Seth’s entity name for John).

Now for Philip: Some impressions, if you will give me a moment, please. [...]

Now you may take a break and we shall continue, and I will, before the evening is over, answer whatever questions Philip might have.

(It will be remembered that Philip is John’s entity name, and that Bill Macdonnel’s entity name is Mark.)

I will here welcome Philip to our session. [...]

[...] I am pleased with Philip’s interest on our behalf. [...]

[...] It is not likely that I will be heard by anyone for some time in the way that Philip heard me speak. [...]

For all my humor concerning the particular communication to Philip, I wanted him to be conscious of hearing me. [...]

In Philip’s case, in one way, my job was easier, since the words were not picked up from the outside. [...]

Good evening, Philip.

A short note also to Philip, thanking him for his consideration, and mentioning that changes are already beginning to occur among the leading men within his company. [...]

(It will be remembered that Philip is the name given by Seth as John Bradley’s entity. [...]

Ruburt is blocking a picture of Philip. [...]

[...] I refer of course to John Bradley, entity name Philip; and John had been a witness to the 63rd session.)

[...] There are inner difficulties of late against which Philip has been struggling. [...]

(In the 84th session, September 2, Volume 2, pages 329 and 331, Seth stated that Jane was blocking “a picture of Philip,” Philip being Seth’s name for John’s entity. [...]

[...] John, your Philip, was definitely called as a reinforcement, and he responded. [...]

(Philip of course is the entity name for John Bradley, who has witnessed several sessions. [...]

[...] Philip added his constructive energy to Ruburt’s, in Ruburt’s attempt to counter your inner vehemence, and you helped yourself to the admittedly small degree of which you were capable at the time.

First however I would like to speak briefly about Ruburt’s attempts at telepathy with Philip last evening. [...]

(Philip is John Bradley’s entity name, according to Seth.)

[...] The results of the Philip experiment were quite adequate, and some rather specific points were covered.

[...] Much work that we have done however in terms of the Philip (John Bradley’s entity area is Philip) readings, will be of great value, and serve to add to the authenticity, in other people’s eyes, of your adventure.

My remark in our last session, concerning the aid that Ruburt subconsciously gave me in connection with the voice effect, did not have to do with the inner voice heard by Philip. [...]

[...] Philip is John Bradley’s entity name.)

I was quite pleased with the amount of quite specific material that I managed to deliver concerning our friend Philip, at our last session.

[...] Philip is John Bradley’s entity name.)

[...] This is why I worked so well with Philip, to make the most of the opportunity while we did have a guest.

[...] Philip is John Bradley’s entity name. [...]

[...] The present personality of our visitor was aware of the sessions before Philip mentioned them. [...]

[...] It will be remembered that Philip is the entity name for John Bradley, who first mentioned the sessions to Lorraine. [...]

[...] You see how well we do in a spontaneous manner, as with Philip.

(Philip is John Bradley’s entity name. [...]

[...] When he is off guard, as he was when Philip was present, then we can achieve very much.

(Philip is John Bradley’s entity name. [...]

Nor is it any accident that those certain people come to the sessions, the ones who did come, just as it is no accident that Philip's mother is also a bed-ridden arthritic, just as Ruburt’s mother is.

(Philip, of course, is the entity name for John Bradley, of Williamsport, PA, who has witnessed several sessions.

Therefore I cannot tell you in advance of any such demonstrations, and in the case of my advice to Philip the slight demonstration of what you would call, I suppose, clairvoyant knowledge had two purposes.

[...] Philip’s abilities along the lines of electronics have not been developed to near capacity, and it was for his own good that I mentioned them. [...]

[...] In our last session, during a break, Philip mentioned the television set as being one physical object, about which he believed you could all agree in any discussion of size, material, color and dimension.

[...] First, you and Philip and Ruburt, when you are all present in the room, each construct from energy your own physical materialization of the idea, television set.

[...] I have spoken to Philip about practicalities, and indeed you have both agreed. [...]

[...] It will be recalled that Philip is the name of John Bradley’s entity. [...]