“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Each channel will represent a portion of the self, each one existing in a different dimension, and yet all part of the whole self, or the whole tape. You can see that it would be highly ridiculous to say that the material on your Mono One was any more or any less valid than your material on Mono Two. Mono One and Mono Two could be compared then to self one and two; self one and two here, however, in the context of the ego as self one and the subconscious as you know it as self two. We are not using Dunne’s terms here, in other words.

We will imagine then these various one and two, Mono One and Mono Two, multiplied, literally, an endless amount of times. Now on your recorder I believe you have a setting for stereo. This enables you to unite and combine harmoniously the elements on the various channels simultaneously. I am taking my time here so that we get this clearly, for I do not often come through with the pure clarity of stereophonic.

[...] The delivery ended with the footage registering 333 on the recorder, Mono One, Side One.

[...] Footage at break was 552, Mono One, Side One.

[...] Footage 762, Mono One, Side One.

(I now had to resume the session on Mono One, Side Two. [...]

[...] You see it would be ridiculous to say that Mono One on your tape was any more or less valid than Mono Two. Mono One could be compared to your present ego.

[...] And mono, also meaning one.

[...] And mono, also meaning one.” [...]

[...] You are operating on mono, you see, as a rule. [...]