“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

There is a June date here insofar as your knowledge of the development is concerned, and there are two partners, or two allied men within your firm who will break apart.

[...] The chips will be down, but another man will pick them up; that is, these two men will drop the chips and another man will pick them up. [...]

[...] John thinks Chase is the more progressive of the two, and is of the opinion that in any clash between these two men a southern regional manager, Don Robinson, would be in a position to pick up pieces. [...]

[...] Three men seem to be involved, and one you cannot trust. [...]

At the same time, Joe holds you in fond regard—yet your abilities also were not those that he traditionally assigned to manhood: men did not paint pictures. [...]

[...] Joe had said it wasn’t right for young men to let themselves go that way. [...]

[...] Men on one side of the planet had to know what men were thinking on the other side. [...]

[...] Men and animals will again meet upon the earth, with the old understanding in yet a new situation.⁷ There are no closed systems, and in deep biological orders each species knows what another is doing, and its place in the overall scheme that has been chosen by each. [...]

[...] An A. Two men and a woman. [...]

(“Can you be more specific about the two men and the woman?”)

(“Two men and a woman. [...]

(3rd Question: Can you be more specific about the two men and the woman? [...]

[...] Imagine if you will now a band of men, some in cars with the high beams of the headlights gleaming, so that some generalized conditions can be seen; and some with low beams showing only the road that the automobiles directly pass. The men can be compared to personified areas of the subconscious, with partial vision of existing conditions.

Only in this case the man in the airplane, instead of a radio message, would radio directly into the mind mechanism of the men below, a dream drama in the coded symbols which would be interpreted automatically by the men below.

Men are not islands, even unto themselves. [...]

[...] this all continues; I feel a twinge of guilt—Rob’s typing reminds me that I was to do my three hours—but this IS writing; cataloging body-mood changes; I want to sketch the men working—eyes, sinuses, ears and neck strongly “working.” [...]

Your working men will be gone. [...]

This time he is improving in spite of the working men, for example. [...]

[...] The working men were a shock treatment of a kind. [...]

[...] Physicians began to think of men as carriers of disease and diseases — which, in certain terms, they [the physicians] did themselves create through some new medical procedures.

The old medicine men often dealt far more directly with the patient himself, and understood the nature of beliefs and the prime importance of suggestion. [...]

(“A group of men.” [...] Around it are clustered groups of men every day, going over the current job on the press. [...]

[...] A group of men. [...]

[...] Perhaps another reference to the group of men idea?

[...] The four men and the room overlooking the water that I mentioned, did refer to the men and the room Mark told you of. [...]

I am not and never will, set Ruburt up or you up, Joseph, as any kind of superior beings, sacred in any way that all men and women are not sacred. [...]

She has accepted the advice of two men in whom she puts great trust. [...]

[...] Many of the men involved were imagining how happy they would be in a medical building, and subconsciously hoping for an excuse to move into one. [...]

Medicine men may do a rain dance. [...]

[...] Damned up, such sexuality still keeps trying for expression, and it is often men of habitual “sexual discipline” who suddenly break out in bouts of sexual promiscuity or violence.

(Long pause at 4:06.) It is sometimes fashionable to say that men and women have conscious minds, subconscious minds, and unconscious minds — but there is no such thing as an unconscious mind. [...]

[...] Women, therefore, can learn much about their reincarnational past as men, through studying those dreams in which these types appear, or in which they themselves appear as men.

[...] The poetry to you clearly shows that he did not regard you in the same light as ordinary men. [...]

[...] If you did not—I am using his terms now—flirt with him and play with him in those terms, he was afraid he would look for that assurance in other men’s eyes.

Regardless of the earlier overidealization he still thinks, you see, that you are unique among men, for true love allows one to perceive the sublime uniqueness of the beloved. [...]

[...] Now you have on occasion been cruel to men you have known rather purposely, intending to hurt them before you could be hurt. [...]

[...] The man realizes, of course, that you do not see him as he is, and each one of the men involved has resented it subconsciously. [...]

Now, you see, you have been robbing yourself of an experience of truly knowing these individual men, for you have not permitted yourself to see them as they are and as they have been. [...]

[...] Now this only applies to men who are older than you. [...]

Women make a grave error when they try to prove their “equality” with men by showing that they can enter the armed forces, or go into combat as well as any man (with more amusement). [...]

[...] To some extent capital punishment is the act of a fanatical society: The taking of the murderer’s life does not bring back the victim’s, and it does not prevent other men from [committing] such crimes. [...]

[...] If a man could actually focus his concentration upon those hidden, feared, mainly unknown, unrecognized elements in the physical universe upon which men simply cannot agree; if he could focus upon the dissimilarities rather than the similarities in the physical universe, he would wonder what gave anyone the idea that there was even one physical object upon which men could agree.

[...] The symbol of fire for example as a dream symbol, simply did not exist in the way that it does now to men born before mankind learned to use fire for warmth, or to cook his food.

[...] It has been said that only men have a moral sense, that only men have free will—if indeed free will is possible at all. [...]

To some extent that emotional reality is also expressed at other levels—as your own is—in periods of dreaming, in which animals, like men, participate in a vast cooperative venture that helps to form the psychological atmosphere in which your lives must first of all exist.