“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Infinity has nothing to do with space or time as you know it. Infinity is the state of becoming and can never have an end for it is never completed. Infinity has to do with value fulfillment, and the unfoldings of ever new possibilities, the exploration of moment points, the traveling through dimensions that ever creates the illusion of time. But since there is no time, what is there to end?

Now, in one sense, all selves are projections of the whole or that which is. New universes such as your own constantly come into existence. Systems and planes far different develop and in turn form other systems. Infinity has meaning only in subjective and psychic terms. The physical brain cannot contain the idea of infinity.

The concept will not fit into three dimensional terms. The whole self, the inner self, moves within the concept of infinity as you move within physical reality through space. Infinity contains all that will ever be known, and, of course, all that will ever be known is known within the spacious present.

If you would identify with your own psychological reality, following the inward structure of thoughts and feelings, you would discover an inward psychological infinity. These “infinities” would reach of course into both an infinite past and future. Yet true infinity reaches far beyond past or future, and into all probabilities — not simply straightforward into time, or backward.

[...] Now here is one for the books (with amusement): but there are different kinds of infinities. There are different varieties of psychological infinities that do not meet — that is, that go off in their own infinite directions.

(10:29.) There is literally an infinity in each moment⁹ you recognize, as numerically there is an “infinity” behind or within any prime number¹⁰ (3, 97, 863, et cetera) that you recognize.

[...] Since consciousness or action can never fully materialize itself, there are literally infinities of such nonexistent areas from which new dimensions can spring.

[...] The formation, the explosion, of energy, shattered consciousness into an infinity of parts, each with all the abilities in here within consciousness itself.

[...] Other personality structures from other dimensions could theoretically then observe it from an infinity of viewpoints. [...]

[...] Any such self A would, without understanding or shortcuts, development, or even average progression, would travel thread A along the narrow line toward infinity. [...]

It, of itself and from that state, has given life to infinities of possibilities. [...]

[...] Other personality structures from other dimensions could then, theoretically, observe it from an infinity of viewpoints. [...]

“Without shortcuts or even average progression, any such Self A would travel Thread A along the narrow line toward infinity. [...]

[...] All That Is saw, then, an infinity of probable, conscious individuals, and foresaw all possible developments, but they were locked within It until It found the means.

[...] There is, instead, an infinity of development and creativity. [...]

Now, there is a connection between these areas and the idea of infinity, but first take your first break, and we shall continue.

You are in touch with infinity in such undifferentiated areas, for it is only camouflage that gives you your conception of time.

[...] In other words, each electrical impulse contains within it its own infinity of variations.

[...] And again, within it are an infinity of variations and depths of intensities, which give it a reality in many dimensions simultaneously. [...]

2 After the session I wanted to tie in Seth’s material on infinity with mathematical ideas of that concept, but my reading soon convinced me that such an idea was too involved a task for a simple note like this. However, I told Jane, in his own way Seth had incorporated mathematical ideas in his material: I saw correlations between his probable realities, his intervals, and the concept of an infinite number of points on a line—and that some mathematical definitions of infinity are considered to be more basic, or of a greater order, than others. [...]

[...] The artist would have to assemble mountains of rocks, an infinity, that is infinity of molecules, all equally impossible. [...]

Foster child of infinity.

[...] These multiple presents can be altered at any of an actual number of infinite points; infinity not existing in terms of one indefinite line, but in terms of numberless probabilities and possible combinations growing out of each act of consciousness.

Translated for you, the eye (spelled) is the symbol for this greater mind, for it sees through all systems, and looking outward sees infinities of itself dancing into its own eyes: the glances themselves vital creations and dimensions of consciousness.

[...] Infinity rests within simultaneous action, in a way that you cannot presently understand.

[...] When you are most yourself, you have the clearest channels to the fountainhead of your being, for you are acting according to the nature, the unique nature, of yourself—and also stressing the great infinity of being from which your own uniqueness emerges. [...]

(She then said:) An infinity has no number. [...]

It is as if infinity doubled in upon itself. [...]

In dreams you are so “insane” that you do not feel yourself locked in a closet of time and space, but feel instead as if all infinity but waited your beckoning.

[...] Yet even the action as it occurs within your system is constantly changing in the ways which we have described, and this changing in itself implies infinities of beginnings and endings within action itself, with no ending, a real or permanent ending, and no beginning, a real beginning out of nothing. [...]

[...] He saw then an infinity of probable, conscious individuals, and foresaw all possible developments, but they were locked within him unless he found the means.

It hints at the most precise and powerful focus, so that amid an infinity of data, events can be arranged at times so that two particular people, for example, separated in childhood, could, 30 years later, find themselves living next door to each other. [...]