Results 761 to 780 of 1873 for stemmed:seth
[...] Once again, her Seth voice was quiet, and I had to pay close attention to hear it competing with other hospital sounds. [...] She took many long pauses, and sighed at times while speaking for Seth. [...]
(“Good afternoon, Seth.”)
(Yesterday I’d mentioned to Jane that I hope Seth, in his current book, will go into the real relationship between wellness and disease. [...]
(I’m quite aware that many of my own questions in this vein spring from insights gained through Jane’s condition — just as Seth referred to such goals on Jane’s part. [...]
(Seth II:) Fantasies are the realities your intellect does not perceive in other fantasies, therefore, those others who watch you and who watch without any awareness of the intellect as you understand it. [...]
(We each described our reactions to Seth II and what we saw at the time.)
(Seth:) ...this was in your inner senses and perceiving a different kind of reality in the same way that you formed what you saw on an unconscious basis, in your terms, so you form the physical matter that forms the room on an unconscious basis. [...]
(Seth II:) In your terms we remember our part in the creation of your universe, but you are not aware of your part in the creation of other universes into which you also peer. [...]
[...] Seth referred to Jane’s habit of pacing endlessly around the room as she talked. [...] so she has a subjective feeling that her voice is different, and that sometimes it is a strain to pause in the middle of a monologue to speak to me as herself and not Seth. At these times she reports that she would rather nod her head to a remark or question of mine, so as not to break her continuity with Seth. [...]
[...] She said that she knew Seth, who was however on a higher plane, and that he would explain the term midplane to us. She also said that Seth would probably call her “Malba Toast.”
(“How are you this evening, Seth?”)
(“Seth, why do Jane’s eyes appear to be darker and more luminous now, when she’s delivering your messages? [...]
(Here Seth refers to the last session, and the confusing envelope data in which Seth told us, in error, that certain data pertaining to a medical building was correct. [...]
(“Good evening, Seth.”)
[...] She said that giving the material tonight was something like taking a test or examination, because Seth wanted her to give voice to his meaning as accurately as possible.
(“Good night, Seth.”
(Today I mentioned to Jane that I’d like Seth to go into some of the elements of question 17 on the list I’ve compiled so far—especially those parts of it pertaining to why didn’t the overall personality know when it had gone far enough, or even too far, concerning the symptoms. [...]
(Following those items, I wanted Seth to comment on question 2, having to do with the good things we’ve accomplished over the years.
[...] But we’re still uneasy over the whole Mass Events affair —the disclaimer question, Jane’s reaction to the book itself since Seth started giving it, etc.—and any delay only serves to make us more suspicious, I’m afraid. [...]
(Jane began to feel Seth around by 9:15. [...]
[...] Seth didn’t appear; however, although Jane said she felt him around at various times. [...] Instead of telling us about it, Seth’s letting me feel the emotions of that young girl you were involved with when you were Nebene, at the time of Christ....” [...]
[...] We then had a discussion that lasted until 10:25, when Seth came through.)
(“Good evening, Seth.”)
(Today I finished editing Chapter 11 of Psyche—Seth’s latest completed book, and wrapped it, with Chapter 10, for mailing to Prentice-Hall tomorrow. I am now caught up with Seth’s work, except for whatever may lie ahead with Mass Reality—but we regard that as current work, still in progress, of course. [...]
(I asked Jane if Seth would comment on my throat difficulty. [...]
[...] She hoped Seth would comment further.
(“Good evening, Seth.”)
(During break, I wondered aloud if she might have selected the book because she intuitively knew Seth was going to discuss its kind tonight — or did Seth use the incident, once it transpired, to make his points in a fresh way? [...]
(Lately I’ve been asking Jane if she thought Seth would give at least a short dissertation on probabilities for this book. [...] [A note added later: Seth kept his word. [...]
[...] Seth’s material, especially that given around 9:34, was quite apropos in light of an amusing incident involving Jane shortly before the session. [...]
[...] Jane had been “way out … I think we’re going to get more on animals and aggression … Boy, Seth’s still here. [...]
(On Saturday January 8 Jane and I received a letter from Dr. Instream, asking that Seth do his best to give data on but one object during tests. [...] Jane and I mentioned that we would like Seth to say something on both points in tonight’s session.
[...] They would keep a record of the chosen objects for a month, without telling us what they were, then we would compare the list with Seth’s data after the experiment ended. [...]
(We had some reservations however about trying it now, but decided to see what Seth would say. [...]
(Ann Diebler has heard Seth speak twice during unscheduled sessions, and had read some of the early material. [...]
[...] I asked that Seth discuss it if she held a session tonight. [...] Seth himself had referred to her dilemma in the excerpt I’ve taken from the private session for January 26, 1981, very well.
[...] Right now she was also uncomfortable as she waited for Seth to come through. [...] By way of contrast, I wanted to ask Seth to comment on the good things her psychic abilities have accomplished. [...]
[...] I added that Seth—and we—must have covered this ground many times over the years; yet now I felt that once again I was “on to something important.”
2. We moved from our downtown apartments into the hill house almost five years ago (in March 1975), but Jane thinks she tried to write the poem Seth referred to several years before that. (She began speaking for Seth late in 1963.) I have no memory of her struggling with such a poem. [...]
[...] February 9, and of my waking experience the next evening.1 Both events had involved intense perceptions of color and/or light, and I’d told Jane that anything Seth cared to say about them would be most welcome. [...]
As Seth came through, Mitzi was playing her favorite game—again and again knocking her paper-ball toy down the steps leading into the celler from the kitchen, then racing down after it and carrying it back upstairs.)
(“Good evening, Seth.”)
(At 8:55 as we sat for the session Jane got another flash, concerning time, that it is “intensely personal, that we create it,” from Seth. She thought Seth would speak on time this evening, in continuing answer to my question in the 422nd session; concerning the manner in which Seth’s larger entity appreciates our time system.
[...] She wondered what Seth would say about it. At about 8:30 this evening she got a flash from Seth, commenting on her asking for help in an amused but not sarcastic way.
(“Good evening, Seth.”)
(This is the first dream including Seth that Jane can remember.)
[...] Break came at 10:25, after Seth had delivered material for his book on the mass psyche. [...] Jane’s quotations in them do apply, however, to material Seth had given as dictation for Psyche.)
[...] Seth did go into the two questions I’d asked at the start of the session.)
(“Thank you, Seth.” [...]
(At the supper table this evening we had been speculating about the times Seth had given in connection with his life as a pope, both in the ESP class session for May 25, 1971, and the 588th session in this chapter. When I wondered if I was right in thinking it likely that Seth’s papal incarnation took place in the fourth century, Jane said she “got” the year A.D. 325. [...] To our further surprise, Seth added to the data concerning that life in tonight’s session.)
(“Good evening, Seth.”)
[...] Short answers from Seth interrupt the rhythmic flow of the material, as far as recording it goes. [...] Usually though, I can see that such passages are most amusing to Seth/Jane.
(At noon today Jane told me she thought Seth would give us a short session, because of the extraordinary one of Monday, 7/6. This was to help me get caught up on all the typing.
(“Good evening, Seth.”)
(During the break we were discussing the volume of Seth’s voice. [...] Seth interrupted as follows:)
[...] Seth had said that this was true only as long as we give up our misconceptions. Seth interjected the following.)
(The validity of Dr. [Gilbert] Holloway’s advice for Brad was being discussed when Seth interjected the following. [...]
(What Seth said was repeated to Jane—ending with the fact that he would be here for a “social time.”)