“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(“Good night, Seth, and thank you.” [...]

(As Seth talked the witness felt a series of intuitive jolts that led her to believe the information was good. [...]

(“Good night, Seth.”

[...] Good night, Seth.” [...]

(“The same to you, Seth.”)

(A Note added later: Sessions between the one above and the one below contain no Seth Material, but are instead sessions in which Jane received book-length and world-view material on the artist Rembrandt. [...]

(“Thank you very much, Seth.”)

(In the 278th session for Monday, August 8,1966, Seth said: “An event in a week and a half, that will be beneficial for you both.” [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

[...] We thought Seth would comment later.

(Seth withdrew and during a discussion, Theodore remarked to Jane, “Must be Seth, your husband and you were old drinking companions in a previous incarnation.”)

(Seth withdrew and there was a class break.)

[...] I want to point out that the Seth groups throughout the country are far more significant than you might realize, for they are not formed as a result of any kind of promotion. [...]

(This rather humorous material from Seth was in reference to a talk Jane and I had, at my instigation, several days ago, when I idly speculated about asking Scott Meredith to personally represent us. [...]

(A copy of Seth’s comments about my dream, which did contain some precognitive elements, is attached to the dream in my own notebook.)

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(Seth then explained he was referring to the days immediately following the deleted session of January 18, 1971, when Jane expressed a lot of her fears, etc.)

(“Thank you Seth—the same to you.”)

(“Good afternoon, Seth.”)

(“Good afternoon, Seth.”

(“Good afternoon, Seth.”)

(“Thank you, Seth.” [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(“Good night, Seth.”

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(“Good night, Seth.”

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

[...] After the session I told Jane I’d been tempted to ask Seth to comment on the tragic situation involving Venice and Howard McCullough, but decided not to because of Jane’s own concerns. [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”

[...] I seemed to go someplace while speaking for Seth....” [...]

[...] She spoke as, following Seth’s suggestions, we sat at the round card table in the living room, waiting to see what might develop. [...]

Now: we will call this a very brief Seth visit—for which there is no charge (with much humor, referring no doubt to the bill from St. Joseph’s). [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

You did not, fully now, realize your contribution to Seth Speaks in financial terms, though you understood your creative contribution. [...]

(In here, I had to laugh as Seth spoke. [...]

(“Thank you very much, Seth. [...]

(“Thank you again, Seth. [...]

(“Thank you, Seth. [...]